흔들리는 사법 정의와 인사권의 역풍, 법무부 장관이 마주한 두 개의 전선 > 뉴스

The core logic raised by Minister of Justice Jeong Sung-ho, directly refuting the claim of 'complete abolition of the right to supplementary investigation' by Chung Cheong-rae, leader of the Democratic Party of Korea, is 'a gap in victim protection'. Minister Jeong sympathizes with the cause of reform, such as reducing the prosecution's direct investigative authority or separating investigation and prosecution, but emphasizes that we should not ignore the hardships of victims that occur in actual investigation sites. He argues that the role of supplementary investigations is especially essential in cases where the victim's testimony is highly dependent and proof is difficult, such as sex crimes or crimes against children or the disabled. He said that if the right to supplementary investigation disappears, one must rely only on the results of the police's primary investigation, and he is wary of the possibility that the powerless and the vulnerable may suffer unfair damages due to delayed or poor investigation.

The alternative presented by Minister Jeong in response to the political circles' argument for the abolition of the right to supplementary investigation is a careful discussion that reflects the voices of the field. He strongly criticized the argument of some that if side effects appear after the abolition of the right to supplementary investigation, they should be supplemented at that time, calling it a 'very irresponsible idea.' This is a warning that system changes without sufficient review are dangerous, as the essential goal of the judicial system should be to prevent even a single wrongful victim from occurring. In addition, concerns were raised that if the right to supplementary investigation is abolished, the 'judicial privatization' phenomenon, which causes victims to bear financial burdens such as appointing lawyers to file objections, may accelerate. This points out that this could ultimately become another barrier for ordinary people who have difficulty accessing legal services.

Meanwhile, Minister Jeong is facing another bad news called an ‘illegal ruling on personnel rights’ from the judiciary. The Seoul Administrative Court ruled that the Ministry of Justice's personnel action against Chief Prosecutor Jeong Yu-mi was a retaliatory measure that lacked procedural legitimacy and canceled the order. The court pointed out that this appointment, which was made without any prior explanation process, was used as a means to suppress critical voices within the prosecution. In response to this, the Ministry of Justice immediately announced its plan to appeal and announced a strong response, but the opposition party, the People Power Party, is escalating its political offensive to the highest level, defining this as an 'abuse of power' and demanding Minister Jeong's immediate resignation. The opposition party's criticism that personnel rights have been reduced to a tool for creating a prosecution organization that suits the regime's tastes is putting a huge political burden on Minister Chung.

Despite the internal and external challenges of running an organization, the Ministry of Justice is faced with the difficult task of preparing for the Serious Crime Investigation Office and Public Prosecution Office system, which are scheduled to be launched in October. Minister Jeong mentioned the case of establishing the Corruption Investigation Office and expressed that it is realistically a very difficult task to establish a large organization in a short period of time. There are concerns that if the organization is reorganized too forcefully while everything from the composition of personnel to the division of duties has not been confirmed, it could lead to a vacuum in investigative capabilities as well as chaos in the national criminal justice system as a whole. In addition, it was emphasized that the Future Respect for Prosecution Human Rights Committee, which was launched to eliminate distrust within the prosecution, will operate independently, but this also leaves room for political interpretation in conjunction with the Daejangdong and North Korea remittance incidents, so considerable difficulties are expected in the future operation process.