A court full of silence and denial, the mystery of ‘church-politician …
페이지 정보

본문
A court full of silence and denial, the mystery of ‘church-political collusion’ left behind by President Hak Ja Han
Written on: June 13, 2026 | Column by current affairs critic specializing in IT/media
Public attention is once again turning to the Seoul Central District Court as President Hak Ja Han of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (Unification Church), who stands at the apex of the suspicion of ‘church-church collusion’ that has shaken the Republic of Korea, appears in court. She sat on the witness stand wearing a hospital gown and cardigan and relying on a wheelchair, and in contrast to her complaining of old age and deteriorating health, she strongly denied the charges and showed a sharp attitude. This trial is expected to be an important turning point in uncovering the true nature of the secret relationship that the Unification Church has had with the political world, beyond simply the trial of an individual. We analyze the complex calculations of what is the truth behind her silence and what impact the comments made in court will have on future trials.
President Hak Ja Han, who appeared in court, took the microphone herself and strongly expressed her position with the permission of the presiding judge before the full-scale interrogation began. She completely denied the allegations that she handed over 100 million won in political funds to People Power Party lawmaker Kwon Seong-dong and that she gifted first lady Kim Kun-hee an expensive necklace and Chanel bag. In particular, she chose a strategy of placing all responsibility on her close associates, saying that all these suspicions were false facts made up by former World Headquarters Director Yoon Young-ho, whom she trusted. Her claim that a person she cared for and trusted in the past is spreading false information on behalf of the church clearly shows the power conflict and division within the church. She emphasized that she has dedicated her life to realizing the Creator's will on earth, and repeatedly emphasized that she had nothing to do with worldly activities such as political bribery.
However, as the special prosecutor's team and former headquarters director Yoon Young-ho's lawyer continued to ask sharp questions, President Han's attitude changed 180 degrees. She argued that she had already made her intentions clear after her previous remarks, and continued to adopt a ‘silent strategy’ by refusing to testify to all subsequent questions. The special prosecutor tenaciously dug into everything from suspicions of funding to foreign politicians, including those in Nepal and Senegal, to instructions to support specific candidates during the presidential election. In response to this, President Han repeatedly answered that he did not remember or did not know, and even made it clear several times that he would refuse to testify. In particular, even though circumstances presented that former Director Yoon could not have handled the work arbitrarily without the president's approval, she resolutely avoided answering, raising the tension in the court to its peak.
One of the key issues revealed in this trial is the suspicion of ‘split sponsorship’ where church funds flowed into the political world and the leak of investigative information. Prosecutors and special prosecutors believe that Governor Han conspired with former Director Yoon and former Chief of Staff Jeong Won-ju to systematically distribute funds to People Power Party lawmakers around the 2022 presidential election. In addition, the charge of obtaining information on the police's expedition gambling investigation in advance and ordering the destruction of evidence suggests that this case may go beyond a simple violation of the political fund law and escalate into suspicions at the level of government interference. During the witness interrogation, President Han briefly denied that he had ever been informed of the fact that he had delivered the Graff necklace to First Lady Kim Kun-hee, but he put up a defensive shield by refusing to answer any questions about the specific flow of funds or the solicitation process. This can be interpreted as a highly strategic decision to minimize legal liability, and the court is faced with the difficult task of finding the truth by synthesizing the evidence submitted and the testimony of those involved.
While the trial was in progress, President Han's lawyers made every effort to exercise their right to defense, emphasizing that her health condition had deteriorated extremely and requesting a recess. The sight of her reading the oath in a wheelchair with the help of her grandchild may elicit sympathy from the public, but it is also being criticized as a means of avoiding legal responsibility. The special prosecutor's team is trying to prove that President Han used his position as the person in charge to lead the illegal solicitation and transfer of money, but President Han's consistent ignorance strategy is becoming an obstacle that slows down the speed of the investigation. Meanwhile, this incident clearly shows how deeply the large religious group called the Unification Church was in collusion with domestic politics. The faces of the people involved in this incident, including the appearance of Geonjinbeopsa Jeon Seong-bae as a mediator, are also blurring the boundaries between the political and religious worlds and inciting public outrage.
■ Conclusion and analysis outlook
Silence in court sometimes says more than any answer. President Hak Ja Han denied all allegations against her and placed the blame on her close associates, but the pouring evidence and specific circumstances indicate that she can never be free from this incident. The reality that she, who has reigned as a world religious leader and called herself the ‘Mother of Peace,’ is now in court on secular and shameful charges of collusion between church and state, raises fundamental questions about the nature of religion. The public's attention is focused on whether the court will be able to break through her silence and uncover the substantive truth at the next trial scheduled for the 19th, or whether this huge suspicion of state corruption will fall into the labyrinth. In order for the justice of the law to be truly implemented, this trial must prove that no sanctuary or silence can serve as a shield.
* This post is an analysis column that is automatically recreated in the style of a current affairs critic's commentary by analyzing real-time Google Trends popular search terms and related major articles.
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.
