주거 혁명과 시장의 역설: 서울의 고층화 바람과 서민의 주거비 고통 > K-wave Trends

Recently, large-scale architectural innovations are being promoted to reorganize urban functions in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Jongno-gu, and Jungnang-gu in Seoul. The supply of a 42-story high-rise complex near Dangsan Station or a large complex with more than 2,000 households in the Shinpung Station area is evaluated as a strategic attempt to increase publicness by securing resident convenience facilities and green space in the form of donations, beyond simply increasing the number of houses. In particular, through projects such as 'Human Town 2.0', the city of Seoul is offering a carrot-and-stick policy of easing the floor area ratio and building-to-land ratio in old low-rise residential areas where redevelopment is difficult, and is encouraging autonomous redevelopment led by residents. This reflects the city of Seoul's strong will to secure the competitiveness of the aging city center by moving away from uniform apartment supply and introducing a customized maintenance method tailored to the characteristics of the region.

Physical changes in living spaces are not limited to hardware but are also expanding to the realm of software. Proptech companies are using artificial intelligence technology to build a platform that manages apartment complexes like a self-driving operating system, and are creating a 'hyper-connected' residential environment where the system operates on its own, from fire detection to handling household complaints. These technological advances are a practical approach to maximizing the safety and convenience of residents and resolving chronic disputes between management offices and residents with data. However, this highly smart residential infrastructure is ultimately being distributed primarily to premium complexes, and how universally the benefits of advanced technology can be spread will remain an important task for future residential welfare.

Behind the flashy lights of development, there is a deep shadow of a serious supply and demand imbalance in the jeon and monthly rent markets. The sale of multiple homes, the expansion of actual residence, and the phenomenon of inversion due to the burden of property tax are placing an unbearable burden on tenants with housing costs. As contracts that increase deposits and adjust monthly rent become routine, tenants are experiencing the double whammy of much higher initial costs and monthly rent payments than in the past. Rental properties are becoming more and more scarce, and the fact that even in areas where occupancy is pouring in, rental prices are not easily falling, clearly shows how vulnerable housing stability is. This goes beyond simple market logic and is an urgent issue directly related to survival for ordinary people who need to find a place to live right away.

Public efforts are not limited to large-scale maintenance projects. Gyeonggi-do is preparing to supply tens of thousands of new homes by flexing the maintenance procedures for villages where development restrictions have been lifted, and companies are contributing to improving the aging residential environment of vulnerable groups as part of social contribution activities. In addition, the court's strict rulings to protect residents from violent crimes that may occur within residential spaces remind us once again how basic and essential the tranquility of housing is. No matter how advanced technology and policies are, it can only be called a true housing innovation if careful consideration is given to ensure that the most vulnerable housing residents are not left out and can enjoy a safe and comfortable environment.