This 32nd Singles Special ended splendidly, providing intense immersion from the beginning. A large number of male performers flocked to a specific performer, creating a so-called ‘4 to 1 date’ situation, and viewers showed great interest in this, saying, “It was so popular that a van was needed.” This phenomenon, coupled with the familiar ‘popular girl’ narrative that is repeated every time, succeeded in creating a tension unique to the program. However, even before the cheers died down, the contrasting situation of ‘0-vote humiliation’ for some of the contestants intersected, and a critical view of ranking human emotions was also raised. This meticulous composition designed by the production team is a powerful device that maximizes the fun of the broadcast, but at the same time shows the dual aspect of reducing each performer's narrative to a simple ‘popularity vote.’

However, it is always the chronic challenge of ‘contestant verification’ that throws cold water on a program’s success. Recently, an exposé posted by a person claiming to be the ex-spouse of a certain 32nd cast member has been spreading through online communities, causing a huge stir. The point of the article is that the reason or process of divorce mentioned by the contestant on the air is different from the actual facts. In particular, with the specific point that “agreed divorce is a lie,” fans who watched the show believing in the sincerity of the contestant are expressing a great sense of betrayal. If these revelations turn out to be true, the credibility of the program will inevitably be fatally damaged, and fundamental skepticism is spreading as to whether the production team's pre-verification system is sufficient to filter out the past of the performers.

Meanwhile, within the huge ecosystem called ‘I’m Solo’, positive news that contradicts the controversy continues. The current status of past Jockey contestants serves as a kind of ‘success story’ or ‘consolation’ to viewers. The news that Kyungsoo of the 28th class got married in real life after receiving a bouquet was congratulated by fans, showing the fruits of the ‘true meeting’ that reality entertainment aims for. In addition, the warmth shown by 7th class member Jeong-suk as she shares her happy daily life with her young daughter proves how relationships formed through past broadcasts lead to a solid foundation for life. These cases serve as positive evidence of hope that the program goes beyond simply consuming provocative content and can be a turning point in someone's life.

The production team at the center of the controversy is sticking to its original position that it is currently checking the matter internally. However, viewers are already tired of repeated contestant risks and are demanding more stringent filtering. Contestants on dating shows take the risk of having their entire lives judged by the public after the show airs. Nevertheless, suspicions about past history that arise every time suggest that the production team should move away from the verification method that relies solely on the performer's self-confession. As well as maintaining the program's buzz, the production team faces the enormous task of establishing a responsible management system that protects the integrity of the cast and satisfies viewers' right to know.